Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 8,911 TYPE 56-1 ASSAULT RIFLES, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01951
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 8,911 TYPE 56-1 ASSAULT RIFLES; 35 AKS-74U ASSAULT RIFLES; 298 AKS20U CARBINE RIFLES; 19 TYPE 80 GENERAL PURPOSE MACHINE GUNS; 265 PKM-PATTERN GENERAL PURPOSE MACHINE GUNS; et al, 8,911 TYPE 56-1 ASSAULT RIFLES, 35 AKS-74U ASSAULT RIFLES; 298 AKS20U CARBINE RIFLES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. Mossberg 30-60 Rifle, Patriot Camo Pattern, Serial No. MPR0015604 with Scope Mueller et al
as 2:2018cv00086
Defendant: Mossberg 30-60 Rifle, Patriot Camo Pattern, Serial No. MPR0015604 with Scope Mueller and Mossberg .375 cal., Serial No. MPR012863
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. $449,822.93 Seized from TD Ameritrade Account #190267682 In the Name of Xingja CUI and Jing Wang as Joint Tenants et al
as 6:2017cv06127
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $449,822.93 Seized from TD Ameritrade Account #190267682 In the Name of Xingja CUI and Jing Wang as Joint Tenants, $36,890.00 United States Currency, 1 China 20 Cents Pattern ND (1912) PCGS SP-63 Secure Holder Together Valued at Approximately $10,157.50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $449,822.93 Seized from TD Ameritrade Account #190267682 In the Name of Xingja CUI and Jing Wang as Joint Tenants et al
as 6:2017cv06127
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $449,822.93 Seized from TD Ameritrade Account #190267682 In the Name of Xingja CUI and Jing Wang as Joint Tenants, $36,890.00 United States Currency, 1 China 20 Cents Pattern ND (1912) PCGS SP-63 Secure Holder Together Valued at Approximately $10,157.50 and others
Claimant: Xingjia Cui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?