Cases 11 - 20 of 216
CRUZ et al v. ASPEN LANDSCAPING CONTRACTING, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv08546
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN MORALES, ANTONIO M. DA ROSA, WILFREDO SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
EASTERN LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS, INC., MARIA FUENTES, ASPEN LANDSCAPING CONTRACTING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN et al v. PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00690
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER
Defendant:
TNG ASSOCIATES, LLC and PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN et al v. PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00677
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER
Defendant:
TNG ASSOCIATES, LLC and PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPEU PENSION FUND et al v. COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2019cv21209
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN, ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER, ITPEU ANNUAL BENEFIT FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JOHN MORGAN and others
Defendant:
Comprehensive Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN et al v. WW CONTRACTORS, INC.
as 2:2019cv18715
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN and ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER
Defendant:
WW CONTRACTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PIZZELLA v. INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv18495
Defendant:
SHAWN RONEY, INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, E&N CONSTRUCTION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK PIZZELLA
RAUSCHER v. QUALCARE, INC.
as 2:2019cv18423
Plaintiff:
GREGORY E. RAUSCHER, M.D. and GREGORY E. RAUSCHER
Defendant:
QUALCARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPEU PENSION FUND et al v. SABROSA FOODS, INC.
as 2:2019cv17971
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN, ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER, ITPEU ANNUAL BENEFIT FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JOHN MORGAN and others
Defendant:
Sabrosa Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN et al v. NMS MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv16921
Plaintiff:
ITPEU PENSION FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JERRY BOWDEN, ITPEU HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND HAROLD E. GELBER and ITPEU ANNUAL BENEFIT FUND, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CO-CHAIRMEN DENNIS ARRINGTON AND JOHN MORGAN
Defendant:
NMS MANAGEMENT, INC. and PENTAD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CASSANO v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv14842
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ANNE E. CASSANO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
