Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Stallworth v. Noble Recovery Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03978
Plaintiff:
William Stallworth
Defendant:
Noble Recovery Services, LLC , Amy Gravley and David Gravley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Vaughn et al v. Transcend Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02348
Plaintiff:
Barbara Vaughn, Amy L. Ford and Lisa Edwards
Defendant:
Transcend Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Marks v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01388
Plaintiff:
Amy Marks
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Holland v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01332
Plaintiff:
Amy Holland
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Flint-Dobson v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01307
Plaintiff:
Amy Flint-Dobson
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stang v. Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc.,
as 2:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Amy Stang
Defendant:
Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Washington et al v. Metrotainment Cafes, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02888
Plaintiff:
Ryan Washington , Ian Ingram and Tatyana Brown
Defendant:
Metrotainment Cafes, LLC , Political Concepts, LLC , Jeffrey Landau and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Anderson et al v. RMG Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01551
Plaintiff:
Amy Anderson , Amber Heard , Holly Castell and others
Defendant:
RMG Corporation , Mark W. Gunn and Robert M. Gunn, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Davis v. Sowinski et al
as 1:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
William Davis
Defendant:
Amy Sowinski , Craig Sowinski and Clean 'N Brite Services of Augusta, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Craig Sowinski , Amy Sowinski and Clean 'N Brite Services of Augusta, LLC
Counter_defendant:
William Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
