Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Qualls v. EOG Resources, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00666
Plaintiff:
Marcus Qualls
Defendant:
EOG Resources Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ferguson v. EOG Resources, Inc.
as 4:2017cv03548
Plaintiff:
Richard Ferguson
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Qualls v. EOG Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00916
Plaintiff:
Marcus Qualls
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc., Bedrock Petroleum Consultants, LLC and Jonathan Falcon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
David M. Jensen v. EOG Resources, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00114
F/k/a Enron Oil And Gas Company:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David M. Jensen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jevan Snead v. EOG Resources, Inc.
as 5:2016cv01134
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jevan Snead
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gabrielson v. EOG Resources, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01826
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gabrielson
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Chaumont v. EOG Resources, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
Brandon Chaumont and Daniel Tipton
Defendant:
Cielo Energy Consulting, LLC, EOG Resources, Inc. and Oaks Personnel Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Wise et al v. EOG Resources, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Gerald Arthur Anderson, Ronnie Mack Armstrong, Jr., Micah Cannady and others
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc. and EnerSafe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Hamilton et al v. Enersafe, Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00965
Defendant:
Jason Anderson, Michael Chad Cunningham, EOG Resources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cody George, Jon Hamilton and Martin W Kolodzire
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Boudreaux v. EOG Resources, Inc.
as 4:2015cv01099
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Boudreaux
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
