Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Avila v. Schlumberger Technology Corp
as 5:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
Frank Avila
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brewer et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2011cv00401
Plaintiff:
Jon Brewer , Nathan Cohen , Quentin Doyle and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP America, Inc. , TRG The Response Group, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Life Insurance Company of North America v. Patton et al
as 3:2010cv00378
Defendant:
Estate of Remicka Shannel Taite-Patton, Benjamin T. Hawkins, Benjamin T. Hawkins, Jr. and others
225) 343-3612 (fax:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Louisiana Carpenters Regional Council v. Stephenson Floors et al
as 3:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Carpenters Regional Council, Louisiana Carpenters Regional Council Health Benefit Fund, Louisiana Carpenters Regional Council Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Frank Ricard and Stephenson Floors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
Frank v. Hess et al
as 2:2007cv09458
Plaintiff:
Lynn Frank
Defendant:
Ronald M. Hess, HMO Louisiana Inc and Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Pension Fund et al v. Catalano et al
as 2:2007cv06885
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Pension Fund, Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Pension Fund, Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Frank C. Catalano and Catalano & Catalano, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Scott v. HKA Enterprises
as 2:2007cv02888
Plaintiff:
Bruce Scott, Bruce Scott, Bruce Scott and others
Defendant:
HKA Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
