Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Lustig v. Whitman et al
as 5:2012cv06410
Plaintiff:
Karyn Lustig
Defendant:
Margaret C. Whitman, Marc L Andreessen, Shumeet Banerji and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Laffen v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Plan Committee Investment Review Committee et al
as 5:2012cv06199
Plaintiff:
Mike Laffen
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company, Plan Committee Investment Review Committee , Hewlett-Packard Company 401(K) Plan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Vincenzo v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
as 3:2012cv03480
Plaintiff:
John Vincenzo
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company , 3COM Corporation Severance Benefit Plan , 3COM Severance Plan for Vice Presidents and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Smith v. Hewlett-Packard Company Disability Plan
as 3:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
William L. Smith
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Patricia A. Preston v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv07149
Defendant:
Does, Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Company Group Benefit Program and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Preston
Hinz v. Hewlett-Packard Company Disability Plan
as 5:2010cv03633
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hinz
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Reading v. Hewlett Packard Company Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 2:2009at01604
Defendant:
Hewlett Packard Company Long Term Disability Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services
Plaintiff:
Cori Reading
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Reading v. Hewlett Packard Company Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 2:2009cv02784
Defendant:
Hewlett Packard Company Long Term Disability Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services
Plaintiff:
Cori Reading
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
