Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Bruno v. Acordis International Corporation et al
as 0:2016cv60994
Plaintiff:
Yelitza Bruno
Defendant:
Acordis International Corporation , Rehan Khan and Narjis Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Khan v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv22615
Plaintiff:
Nahid Khan
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Khan v. LCC International, Inc.
as 0:2015cv60173
Plaintiff:
Naved Sami Khan
Defendant:
LCC International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Khan v. P.D.K.N. P-4 OP, LLC
as 0:2014cv61967
Plaintiff:
Lee Khan
Defendant:
P.D.K.N. P-4 OP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Khan v. Delta Stamping Co. et al
as 6:2013cv01090
Plaintiff:
Altaf Khan
Defendant:
Delta Stamping Co. , Wrico Stamping Co. of Florida and Minnesota Griffiths Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Merced v. All Wireless Phone, Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00624
Plaintiff:
Olga Merced
Defendant:
All Wireless Phone, Inc, Fazal Muneer and Shahid Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Carballo et al v. CK Westfield Brandon, LLC. et al
as 8:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
Saul Carballo and Adriana Altaminano
Defendant:
Todd Scheck, CK Westfield Brandon, LLC. and Arshad Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dunakin et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2011cv22332
Plaintiff:
Ray Dunakin , Daniel D. Fitzgerald , William E. Harilson and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Khan v. H & R Block Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2011cv20217
Plaintiff:
Mirta Khan
Defendant:
H & R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rodriguez v. Waltco Metal Incorporated et al
as 1:2011cv20209
Plaintiff:
Ariel Mayor Rodriguez
Defendant:
Waltco Metal Incorporated, Mohammed Khan and Mohammed Siddique
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
