Cases 11 - 20 of 31
ROLANDO CUN v. DGNY GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2018cv14951
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROLANDO CUN
Defendant:
ALEXANDER DURAN and DGNY GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LOJA v. MENDEL'S MUFFINS AND STUFF, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv09248
Plaintiff:
MARIO LOJA
Defendant:
MENDEL'S MUFFINS AND STUFF, INC. , BEST BITES DISTRIBUTIONS, INC. and GERSHON NEUSTADT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
EAMES v. MARIO'S EXPRESS SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03807
Plaintiff:
EILEEN EAMES
Defendant:
MARIO'S EXPRESS SERVICE, INC. , MARIO PEREIRA , LEE PEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
RODRIGUEZ v. GENSERVE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02641
Plaintiff:
MARIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
GENSERVE, INC., GENERATOR HOLDING CORPORATION, ROBERT FORTUNATO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
DaCosta et al v. UNION COUNTY COLLEGE et al
as 2:2017cv06372
Plaintiff:
MARIO DACOSTA and ALEXANDRA ZUMBA
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY COLLEGE , COUNTY OF UNION and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOS SANTOS v. ARCOS VISEU LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08965
Plaintiff:
MARIO DOS SANTOS
Defendant:
ARCOS VISEU LLC, MANUEL CERQUEIRA, JOAQUIM FERNANDES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
REYES v. CLUB 1199 et al
as 2:2016cv02800
Plaintiff:
YRMA REYES
Defendant:
CLUB 1199 and MARIO MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CRUZ et al v. DOUBLE D CONTRACTORS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv06520
Plaintiff:
FIDENCIO NATAREN CRUZ , MARIO HENNANDEZ , ROLANDO ALFARO and others
Defendant:
DOUBLE D CONTRACTORS, LLC and DENNIS DARROW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarez et al v. General Electric Company
as 1:2014cv03134
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO ALVAREZ, Lance Bergmann, Fernandez S Austin and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
MORALES v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01614
Plaintiff:
MARIO MORALES
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD., IBRAHIM A ISSA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
