Cases 11 - 19 of 19
COHEN v. AETNA INSURANCE et al
as 2:2012cv05494
Plaintiff:
MARC COHEN
Defendant:
AETNA INSURANCE, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA INC and ABC CORP. (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MONTVALE HEALTH ASSOCIATES et al v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv03684
Plaintiff:
MONTVALE HEALTH ASSOCIATES and IN-BALANCE HEALTH, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA INC , ABC CORP. (1-10) and AETNA INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
TUCKER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE et al
as 2:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
SANDI TUCKER
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE , UPS, JOSEPH BUTKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
FUTURE CARE CONSULTANTS, L.L.C. v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2012cv00739
Plaintiff:
FUTURE CARE CONSULTANTS, L.L.C.
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GIRESI v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
as 3:2011cv01944
Plaintiff:
MARK GIRESI
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 177 v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 177
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
MASSAQUOI v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 177, et al
as 2:2009cv01671
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 177, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, ABC CORPS. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 177 v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2009cv00903
Petitioner:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 177
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCINTYRE v. THE UNITED PARCEL SERVICE et al
as 2:2008cv05517
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCINTYRE
Defendant:
THE UNITED PARCEL SERVICE and PAUL UNGERLEIDER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
