Cases 21 - 30 of 206
SU v. P & B PARTITIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv03456
Plaintiff:
Acting Secy of Labor JULIE A. SU and JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
P & B PARTITIONS, INC. and RONALD H. BIGLIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MANIS v. SINGER HOLDING CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
JOANNA MANIS
Defendant:
SINGER HOLDING CORPORATION D/B/A ROBISON OIL and SINGER HOLDING CORPORATION doing business as ROBISON OIL
COUNTY CONCRETE CORPORATION UNION PENSION PLAN FOR HOURLY EMPLOYEES et al v. BRAMSHILL INVESTMENTS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
COUNTY CONCRETE CORPORATION UNION PENSION PLAN FOR HOURLY EMPLOYEES, JOHN CRIMI and TRACEY CRIMI
Defendant:
BRAMSHILL INVESTMENTS, LLC, CAPITALE INVESTMENTS LLC, JOHN KITTANEH and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
HOTEL & GAMING TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO v. DANGAYACH EDISON HOTELS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02687
Petitioner:
Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, formerly known as the New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council, the New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council and HOTEL & GAMING TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
DANGAYACH EDISON HOTELS, LLC, EDISON HOTEL OPERATIONS, LLC d/b/a SHERATON EDISON RARITAN and SHERATON EDISON HOTEL RARITAN CENTER
Respondent:
DANGAYACH EDISON HOTELS, LLC, EDISON HOTEL OPERATIONS, LLC doing business as SHERATON EDISON RARITAN and SHERATON EDISON HOTEL RARITAN CENTER
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION AND PARTICIPATING FOOD INDUSTRY EMPLOYERS TRI-STATE HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. CONSULATE HEALTH CARE, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION AND PARTICIPATING FOOD INDUSTRY EMPLOYERS TRI-STATE HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
CONSULATE HEALTH CARE, LLC d/b/a FROSTBURG VILLAGE, STERLING CARE FROSTBURG VILLAGE and CONSULATE HEALTH CARE, LLC doing business as FROSTBURG VILLAGE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CHEN et al v. RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02591
Plaintiff:
DAN DAN CHEN, MEI FENG LIN, XUE RAN HUANG and others
Defendant:
RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. D/B/A HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET, HE PING CHEN, QI YUN CHEN and others
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION AND PARTICIPATING FOOD INDUSTRY EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND SAID FUND, AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. KTM SUPERMARKETS, INC.
as 1:2023cv02538
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION AND PARTICIPATING FOOD INDUSTRY EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND SAID FUND, AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant:
KTM SUPERMARKETS, INC. d/b/a SHOPRITE OF WEST CHESTER and KTM SUPERMARKETS, INC. doing business as SHOPRITE OF WEST CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HOTEL & GAMING TRADES COUNCIL V. DANGAYACH EDISON HOTELS, LLC, ET AL.
as 2:2023cv02518
Petitioner:
HOTEL & GAMING TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
DANGAYACH EDISON HOTELS, LLC, EDISON HOTEL OPERATIONS, LLC d/b/a SHERATON EDISON RARITAN and SHERATON EDISON HOTEL RARITAN CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES-ST. MICHAEL'S LLC v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv01791
Plaintiff:
PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES-ST. MICHAEL'S LLC D/B/A ST. MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF NEW JERSEY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ARIAS et al v. FAMILY FIRST FUNDING, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCA ARIAS, CHERIE LYN COWELL, PATRICIA KOSTAK and others
Defendant:
FAMILY FIRST FUNDING, LLC, GABRIEL GILLEN, NEUSA GILLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
