Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Broadfoot v. Williams et al
as 7:2016cv00209
Petitioner:
DAMARIS S. BROADFOOT
Respondent:
TIFFNEY WILLIAMS, REBECCA BYNUM, BILLY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Black et al v. Delaware North Companies Travel Hospitality Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01410
Plaintiff:
Monae Black , Michelle Glass and Dalandra Evans
Defendant:
Delaware North Companies Travel Hospitality Services, Inc. and Delaware North Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Falanga v. BTW Atlanta, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01155
Plaintiff:
Michelle E. Falanga
Defendant:
BTW Atlanta, LLC and Jeffrey S. Bolhous
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Cunningham et al v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv00533
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia, John H. Eaves, Liz Hausmann and others
Plaintiff:
Cunningham, Tracey Cunningham, Adriana Christopher and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
IN RE GENTIVA HEALTH SERVICES, INC., FLSA CASES
as 1:2015mi55555
Plaintiff:
Diane Smith, Cynthia Bailey, Marjorie Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Conway et al v. Charmi, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Michelle Conway and David Locke
Defendant:
Charmi, LLC and Bahrat Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
PORTER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 4:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE DENISE PORTER
Defendant:
J LEN WILLIAMS and HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Drahos v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01402
Plaintiff:
Michelle Drahos
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boersma v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01163
Plaintiff:
Michelle Boersma
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bailey v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01075
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bailey
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
