Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. COMMERCIAL INTERIOR DESIGN, INC.
as 2:2010cv00812
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND and HARRY T. WILLIAMS
Defendant: COMMERCIAL INTERIOR DESIGN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. CAMERON MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2009cv01930
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND, HARRY T. WILLIAMS, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 ANNUITY FUND and others
Defendant: CAMERON MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. PHOENIX GLAZING, INC.
as 2:2009cv00647
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND and HARRY T. WILLIAMS
Defendant: PHOENIX GLAZING, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. GENSIS GROUP, LTD.
as 2:2008cv05814
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND, HARRY T. WILLIAMS, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: GENSIS GROUP, LTD.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. SOUTHERN STATES ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv05784
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND, HARRY T. WILLIAMS, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: SOUTHERN STATES ENTERPRISES, LLC, DDS, INCORPORATED, JKD CONTRACTING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. C.P.C. ENTERPRISES et al
as 2:2008cv05730
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND, HARRY T. WILLIAMS, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: C.P.C. ENTERPRISES and DONNA FREAS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Yu v. State Street Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv08235
Plaintiff: Ning Yu
Defendant: State Street Corp. , Agustin J Fleites , Peter G. Leahy and others
Movant: Anatoly Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. FRANKLIN GLASSWORKS, INC.
as 2:2008cv04584
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND, HARRY T. WILLIAMS, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: FRANKLIN GLASSWORKS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2008cv02408
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND, HARRY T. WILLIAMS, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: SHAFFER DESOUZA BROWN and RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
as 2:2008cv02407
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND, HARRY T. WILLIAMS, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?