Labor Cases filed in Texas
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Campos v. Dane et al
as 6:2016cv00008
Plaintiff: Adrian Campos
Defendant: Jimmy Dane and Maverick Oil Tools LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Montemayor v. Knight Oil Tools, LLC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00315
Plaintiff: Marcos Montemayor
Defendant: Knight Oil Tools, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Shields v. Delta Rigging & Tools, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00219
Plaintiff: Charles Shields
Defendant: Delta Rigging & Tools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sato v. Japan Machine Tools Corp. et al
as 4:2014cv02688
Plaintiff: Natsumi Sato
Defendant: Japan Machine Tools Corp. and Ryoichi Yamaji
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stephenson v. Branton Tools of Texas, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv00034
Plaintiff: Robby Stephenson
Defendant: Branton Tools of Texas, LLC and Dennis Branton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cook v. Pioneer Fasteners & Tools, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00415
Plaintiff: Christopher Lane Cook
Defendant: Pioneer Fasteners & Tools, Inc., Thomas Broadbent and Mary Van Tol
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Flores v. Sub-Surface Tools, L.L.C.
as 2:2013cv00119
Defendant: Sub-Surface Tools, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Richard Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Celestein et al v. Schooner Petroleum Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01338
Plaintiff: Kinley Celestein, David L Gotcher, Rebecca Lawlis and others
Petitioner: Susan Staley
Defendant: Schooner Petroleum Services, Inc., Oil States International, Inc. and Specialty Rental Tools & Supply, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 WARN ACT
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Carrillo v. Chance et al
as 4:2007cv00068
Plaintiff: Favian Carrillo
Defendant: Joe Chance, Chance Tool Company, LTD and Rapid Transport, LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?