Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Cho v. Maru Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08151
Plaintiff:
Young Hee Cho
Defendant:
Maru Restaurant, Inc. and Hye Yong Choi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Vasto et al v. Credico (USA) LLC et al
as 1:2015cv06503
Plaintiff:
Philip Vasto , Zao Yang , Alex Torres and others
Defendant:
Credico (USA) LLC , Cromex, Inc., Jesse Young and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Park et al v. Nagle Advisors, LLC. et al
as 1:2015cv05152
Plaintiff:
Young Bok Park , Susan Park , Gang Jong Joo and others
Defendant:
Nagle Advisors, LLC., 5900 Greenwood Advisors, LLC., Kildeer Advisors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Choi v. Kenny Logistics Co. et al
as 1:2015cv05140
Plaintiff:
Young Ill Choi
Defendant:
Kenny Logistics Co. and Jong Chang Song
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kim v. Hakuya Sushi, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv03747
Plaintiff:
Young Chol Kim
Defendant:
Hakuya Sushi, INC. and Chul Kim
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Venancio v. Young Hospitality Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03417
Plaintiff:
Roselio Venancio
Defendant:
Young Hospitality Staffing, Inc. and Roger Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Young v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company
as 1:2015cv02771
Plaintiff:
Byron Young
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kim v. Capital Dental Technology Laboratory, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05014
Defendant:
Capital Dental Technology Laboratory, Inc. and Luke S Kahng
Plaintiff:
Joon Young Chul Kim
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Howard et al v. Secuitas Security Services, USA Inc,
as 1:2008cv02746
Plaintiff:
Paul Galloway, Crystal Howard, Robert Newson and others
Defendant:
Securitas Security Services, USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Park et al v. Dundee market III, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01541
Plaintiff:
min sik park and mi og park
Defendant:
Dundee market III, Inc. , Chul Min Kim and Young Ja Hong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
