Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Haecker v. Youth Villages, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03465
Defendant:
Youth Villages, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Haecker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
MCCARTY v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
SHANE MATTHEW MCCARTY
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Armstead et al v. Youth Villages, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02470
Plaintiff:
Terence Armstead , Bernard Artumus , Meranda Bice and others
Defendant:
Youth Villages, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Deese et al v. Bonnaroo Restaurant Group II, L.P. et al
as 1:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Deese , Constance Dubose , Michelle Feist and others
Defendant:
Hielan Payroll, LLC and Bonnaroo Restaurant Group II, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
O'Conner v. Neace et al
as 1:2014cv03927
Plaintiff:
Trinity O'Conner
Defendant:
Oscar Neace and Matthew Neace
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Ansley et al v. Bonnaroo Restaurant Group II, LLP et al
as 1:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
Bryce Ansley , Michael Cullinan, III , Philip Jordan, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bonnaroo Restaurant Group II, LLP and Hielan Payroll, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
O'Weger v. DealDash Inc.
as 1:2014cv02076
Plaintiff:
Matthew O'Weger
Defendant:
DealDash Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Campbell v. Dependable Waste Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Campbell
Defendant:
Dependable Waste Services, Inc. and Douglas Matthews
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Bailey v. Innovative Contracting Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04114
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bailey
Defendant:
Innovative Contracting Solutions, Inc. and Matthew Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Lee et al v. Glovis Georgia, LLC
as 1:2013cv03514
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee , Leslie Cruz , Matthew Drake and others
Defendant:
Glovis Georgia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
