Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union-New York Employees Pension Fund et al v. Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union-New York Welfare Fund et al
as 1:2011cv03614
Plaintiff:
Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union-New York Employees Pension Fund and Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union-New York Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union-New York Welfare Fund and New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Singletary v. Allied Barton Security Service
as 11-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elmer Singletary, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Allied Barton Security Services, Lou Philips, (Allied Barton), Kossi Numekpeku, (Allied Barton) and others
USA United Fleet Inc. et al v. Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union New York Pension Fund et al
as 1:2011cv02140
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union New York Pension Fund and Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union New York Welfare Fund
Counter Claimant:
Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union New York Pension Fund, Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union New York Pension Fund, Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union New York Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union New York Pension Fund, Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union New York Welfare Fund and New York City Department of Education
ThirdParty Defendant:
William Moran, Northeast Buses Inc., Northeast Transit, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Tom Tom Escorts Only, Inc., Tom Tom Escorts Only, Inc., USA United Bus Express Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Tom Escorts Only, Inc., USA United Bus Express Inc., USA United Fleet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Singletary, Jr. v. AlliedBarton Security Service
as 11-1433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elmer Singletary, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Allied Barton Security Services, Lou Philips, Kossi Numekpeku and others
Hunt v. Klein
as 11-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sheldon Lamar Hunt
Defendant - Appellee:
Joel Klein, Chancellor, New York City Department of Education
Singletary v. AlliedBarton Security Service
as 11-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elmer Singletary, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
AlliedBarton Security Services, Lou Philips, (Allied Barton), Kossi Numekpeku, (Allied Barton) and others
Jiggets v. New York City Department of Citiwide Administrative Services et al
as 1:2011cv01245
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jiggets
Defendant:
New York City Department of Citiwide Administrative Services and AlliedBarton Security Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Singletary v. Allied Barton Security Service
as 11-434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elmer Singletary, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Allied Barton Security Services, Lou Philips, (Allied Barton), Kossi Numekpeku, (Allied Barton) and others
Singletary v. Allied Barton Security Services et al
as 1:2010cv05752
Defendant:
Allied Barton Security Services and Labor Union Seiu (32BJ)
DCAS:
New York City Department of Adminstrative Services and Sergeant Maria Ortiz
Allied Barton:
Kossi Numekpeku and Lou Philips
Plaintiff:
Elmer Singletary, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lasonde v. Correction Officer's Benevolen
as 10-2776
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Chandra Lasonde
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Allen Blake
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Correction Officer's Benevolent Association, Inc., Norman Seabrook, individually and in his official capacity as President of Correction Officer's Benevolent Association, Inc. and Elias Husamudeen, individually and in his official capacity as Executive Board member of Correction Officer's Benevolent Association, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Dora Schriro, individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Correction and Larry Davis, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Department of the City of New York Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
