Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Nguyen v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv06453
Plaintiff:
John Nguyen
Defendant:
Ericsson, Inc. , 4G Project People, Inc. , Networkers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguyen v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02096
Plaintiff:
Kenny Nguyen
Defendant:
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185
Nguyen v. MarketSource, Inc.
as 3:2017cv02063
Plaintiff:
Kevin Nguyen
Defendant:
MarketSource, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray et al v. Tran et al
as 3:2017cv01870
Defendant:
Thao Nguyen, Streamline Dental Solutions, LLC, My D. Tran and others
Plaintiff:
Ian Murray, Tran Murray Dental Corporation and Ian Murray D.M.D., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
Nguyen v. EOS IT Management Solutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv03604
Plaintiff:
Mike Nguyen
Defendant:
EOS IT Management Solutions, Inc. and EOS Unified Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jason N. Nguyen v. Impac Mortgage
as 8:2017cv00723
Defendant:
CashCall, Inc., Impac Mortgage and Impac Mortgage doing business as CashCall Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Tam Nguyen and Jason N. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lemus v. Thanh BBQ & Noodle, Inc et al
as 5:2017cv01890
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lemus
Defendant:
Thanh BBQ & Noodle, Inc., Com Tam Thanh, Inc., Lien Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez v. JJ Nguyen, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01472
Plaintiff:
Edgar Daniel Lopez
Defendant:
JJ Nguyen, Inc., Tu Bao Nhu Nguyen and Vy Loan Tran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Ted Nguyen v. Los Angeles County Office of Education et al
as 2:2016cv07874
Defendant:
Johnathan Crotty, Does, Rod Freudenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Ted Nguyen
Siatunuu et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv02323
Plaintiff:
Joanne Siatunuu and Tue Nguyen
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
