Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Stone v. Avmed, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Christie Stone
Defendant:
Avmed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stone v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01621
Plaintiff:
Erin Stone
Defendant:
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fields, et al v. Diamond Resorts International, Inc, et al
as 6:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Fields, Robert Stone, Justin Allis and others
Defendant:
Diamond Resorts International, Inc, Diamond Resorts International, Inc., Diamond Resorts International Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Quart v. The Table LLC et al
as 6:2016cv00830
Plaintiff:
Rachel Quart
Defendant:
The Table LLC , Stone Rhodes Group, LLC and Tyler Brassil
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carrasquel v. Stone & Wood Design, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv20670
Plaintiff:
Dima De Jesus Ronda Carrasquel
Defendant:
Stone & Wood Design, Inc. and Manuel E. Miguel
Mediator:
Carol Soret Cope
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Mancia v. Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23376
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Mancia
Defendant:
Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. , Mimato, Inc. , Ignacio Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rosenberg v. Southern Stone Communications of Florida, LLC
as 6:2015cv01426
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rosenberg
Defendant:
Southern Stone Communications of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
STONE v. PEGLEG PETE'S INC et al
as 3:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J STONE
Defendant:
PEGLEG PETE'S INC , SCOTT AMBERSON and KRIS AMBERSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Capousis v. The Table LLC et al
as 6:2015cv00515
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Capousis
Defendant:
The Table LLC , Stone Rhodes Group, LLC and Tyler Brassil
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
STONE v. PEG LEG PETE'S et al
as 3:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. STONE
Defendant:
PEG LEG PETE'S, SCOTT AMBERSON and KRIS AMBERSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
