Cases 41 - 47 of 47
College of Dental Surgeons of Puerto Rico v. Triple S Management Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2009cv01209
Plaintiff:
College of Dental Surgeons of Puerto Rico
Defendant:
Triple S Management Inc., Triple S Inc, Triple C, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sweeting et al v. Triple S, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01845
Plaintiff:
Robert Sweeting, Carol Blanco and Conjugal Partnership Sweeting-Blanco
Defendant:
Triple S, Inc., Juan Espinosa and ABC Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ortega-Reyes v. Great American Assurance Company of Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01268
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ortega-Reyes
Defendant:
Great American Assurance Company of Puerto Rico, Inc., Seguros Triple S, Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01218
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rodriguez-Rodriguez and Pedro Rodriguez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc., Verizon Wireless, Puerto Rico Telephone Company Disability Insurance Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Huggins v. Triple-S, Inc.
as 3:2007cv02146
Plaintiff:
Mary Huggins
Defendant:
Triple-S, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Diaz-Padilla v. Triple-S, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01246
Plaintiff:
Luis E. Diaz-Padilla
Defendant:
Triple-S, Inc., Triple-S, Inc. and Triple-S, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Maldonado-Rodriguez v. Triple-S, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01119
Plaintiff:
Helia Maldonado-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Triple-S, Inc., Triple-S, Inc., Triple-S, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.