Cases 51 - 56 of 56
Canone et al v. Filco Carting Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv03526
Plaintiff:
Daniel Canone and Richard Moreno
Defendant:
Filco Carting Corp., Meserole St. Recycling, Inc, Rudolph C. Filiberto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Cement Masons Pension Fund, Local 502 et al v. J & L Concrete, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00932
Plaintiff:
Cement Masons Pension Fund, Local 502, Cement Masons Institute of Chicago, Illinois, Cement Masons Savings Fund, Local 502 and others
Defendant:
J & L Concrete, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Dugan et al vs. J & L Management Corporation
as 1:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
William E. Dugan, William E. Dugan, William E. Dugan and others
Defendant:
J & L Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. J&L Management Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv01204
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
J&L Management Corporation and Philip J. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Laborers' Penison Fund et al v. J & L Concrete, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv05448
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Penison Fund, Laborers' Penison Fund, Laborers' Penison Fund and others
Defendant:
J & L Concrete, Inc. and Material Transportation, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund et al v. J&L Home Improvement, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02669
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund, Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund, Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
J&L Home Improvement, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
