Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Heinisch v. Visron Technical, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv07757
Plaintiff:
Andrew Heinisch
Defendant:
Visron Technical, LLC , Wabtec Corp., Joel Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kaplan et al v. Houlihan Smith & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05134
Defendant:
Houlihan Smith & Co., Inc., Richard Houlihan, Andrew D. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Kaplan and Ian Dolby
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Starr et al v. Chicago Cut Steakhouse Llc
as 1:2012cv04416
Plaintiff:
Amy Starr and Andrew G Phelan
Defendant:
Chicago Cut Steakhouse, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Schneider, et al v. Funk Linko, Inc
as 1:2012cv03731
Plaintiff:
Richard L Schneider , Michael Murzanski , Andrew Knarvik and others
Defendant:
Funk Linko, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Maro v. Hat World, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03681
Defendant:
Hat World, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Maro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
McCauley v. Sun Singer Wine & Spirits Ltd et al
as 2:2012cv02106
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott McCauley
Defendant:
Sun Singer Wine & Spirits Ltd and Mark Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mendiola v. Bur Oak Landscape, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv08171
Defendant:
Bur Oak Landscape, LLC, Michael Puccio and Andrew Puccio
Plaintiff:
Rutilo Mendiola
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Decker v. CCS Employee Benefits Group, Inc. Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Associatin et al
as 1:2011cv04470
Plaintiff:
Andrew Decker
Defendant:
CCS Employee Benefits Group, Inc. , Premium Conversion Plan and Gale Rothner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Addison et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2011cv04086
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Todd W. Addison , Jon Michael Cantowine , Gregory A. Doty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castro v. ITALK, LLC
as 1:2011cv00372
Plaintiff:
Felipe Castro
Defendant:
ITALK, LLC, Amir Bishai, Brad Church and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
