Cases 61 - 70 of 682
DYAL v. STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
as 4:2021cv00396
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE DYAL
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Sheridan v. John Abell Corporation
as 1:2021cv23049
Plaintiff:
John T Sheridan
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Martin E. Leach
Defendant:
John Abell Corporation
Consolidated Defendant:
Daniel L. Leyton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
POOLE v. KRATOS LOGISTICS LLC et al
as 1:2021cv22609
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY E. POOLE and TRAVIS TAYLOR
Defendant:
KRATOS LOGISTICS LLC, MIGUEL ANGEL RODRIGUEZ and DANIEL CAMEJO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Guerra v. P.D.K. Roofing, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv14293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guerra
Defendant:
P.D.K. Roofing, Inc. and Dee Keihn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED ARMOR, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv22258
Defendant:
UNITED ARMOR, INC., UNITED ARMOR OF FLORIDA INC and EDISSON LOZADA
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Barrios v. Specialized Towing and Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv22012
Defendant:
RAUL HERRERA, RIGOBERTO HERRERA, JUAN J. HERRERA and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BARRIOS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Petrie et al v. R&J Plumbing & Backflow Service, Inc.
as 0:2021cv60778
Plaintiff:
Joseph B Petrie, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND, Robert ABRUSCATI and others
Defendant:
R&J Plumbing & Backflow Service, Inc. and ONE TRADE CAPITAL INC. doing business as R&J Plumbing and Backflow Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Wood v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv21326
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wood
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
COSSABOOM et al v. NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv80627
Plaintiff:
MELISSA COSSABOOM, Melissa Collins, ANN ADAIR HATCH and others
Defendant:
NVR, INC. and NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
