Labor Cases filed in California
Cases 71 - 80 of 892
Hotchkiss v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv02392
Plaintiff: Kathy E. Hotchkiss
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. S & L Sweeping, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02376
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: S & L Sweeping, Inc. and Larry Quilici
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. Bore One, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02058
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Bore One, Inc. and Christopher Newman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. Substructure Support, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01898
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Substructure Support, Inc. and Steve Neville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. Housley Demolition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01869
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Housley Demolition Company, Inc. and Todd Housley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Dan Reding et al v. Housley Demolition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01880
Plaintiff: Dan Reding, James E. Murray, Operating Engineers Local 3 Heavy And Highway Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Housley Demolition Company, Inc. and Todd Housley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. Housley Demolition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01884
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Housley Demolition Company, Inc. and Todd Housley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. T & D Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00899
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Dan Reding and others
Defendant: T & D Services, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as T & D Trenchless and Donald Thomas Van Dyke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Forbush v. NTI-CA Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00141
Plaintiff: Michael J. Forbush
Defendant: NTI-CA Inc. a Nevada Corporation doing business as NTI Ground Trans, John E. Kindt and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Little v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00300
Plaintiff: Michael Little
Defendant: Pacific Gas and Electric Company and PG&E Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?