Labor Cases filed in California
Cases 81 - 90 of 503
Coates v. CA Pines Community Services District We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01112
Plaintiff: Joshua C. Hicks, Jordan C. Verece, Joshua B. Lusk and others
Defendant: Ryan Sherer, California Pines Community Services District and Ron Sherer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Coates v. California Pines Community Services District
as 2:2020at00538
Plaintiff: Joshua C. Hicks, Jordan C. Verece, Joshua B. Lusk and others
Defendant: Ryan Sherer, California Pines Community Services District and Ron Sherer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. C. Aparicio, Cement Contractor, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03219
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, The Board of Trustees, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant: C. Aparicio, Cement Contractor, Inc. and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cross Defendant: Edgar Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. B&C Asphalt Grinding, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02456
Defendant: Michael Anthony Biasi, B&C Asphalt Grinding, Inc. and John Robert Carroll
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 Vacation, Holiday and Sick Pay Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Operating Engineers And Participating Employers Pre-Apprentice, Apprentice And Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Schultz Industrial Services, Inc.
as 2:2020cv03266
Defendant: Schutlz Industrial Services, Inc., a California corporation formerly known as Schultz Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Schultz Industrial Services, Inc. and Schultz Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff: Construction Laborers Trust Funds For Southern California Administrative Company, a Delaware limited liability company, c/o Peter A. Hutchinson, Esq., REICH, ADELL & CVITAN, a PLC, 3550 Wilshire Blvd. and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gilmore v. McMillan-Hendryx et al
as 2:2020at00344
Plaintiff: Edmond Trent Gilmore
Defendant: McMillan-Hendryx Incorporated, Deb C. Hall, Justin Hendryx and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gilmore v. McMillan-Hendryx, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00483
Plaintiff: Edmond Trent Gilmore
Defendant: McMillan-Hendryx Incorporated, Deb C. Hall, Justin Hendryx and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Angelica Corporation et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01968
Plaintiff: Kenneth C. Smith
Defendant: 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P., Angelica Textile Services Inc. and Angelica Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Hershal Bridges, III et al v. Dealers Choice Truckaway System, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01620
Defendant: IronTiger Logistics, Inc., Dealers' Choice Truckaway System, Inc., Dealers Choice Truckaway System, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jason C. Hurd, III and Hershal Bridges, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Javier v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00725
Plaintiff: Lia C Javier
Defendant: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?