Cases 81 - 90 of 301
Stargell v. H.E.H. Paving, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03712
Defendant:
Hobson Milner, Herbert Williams, H.E.H. Paving, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kreaton Stargell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Beatty v. OSP Prevention Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03292
Plaintiff:
Kenessia Beatty
Defendant:
OSP Prevention Group, Inc. and William E. Mabry, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blash v. H.E.H. Paving, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02605
Plaintiff:
Fred Blash
Defendant:
H.E.H. Paving, Inc., Herbert Williams, Hobson Milner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Pitts v. Chris's Truck Repair et al
as 6:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
William Pitts
Defendant:
Chris's Truck Repair and Chris Akridge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Compton v. H.E.H. Paving, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02117
Plaintiff:
Devonte Compton
Defendant:
H.E.H. Paving, Inc., Herbert Williams, Hobson Milner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Williams v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 7:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
MAE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Williams et al v. Prime Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01849
Plaintiff:
Timothy Williams , Erik McLeroy , Andrew Attaway and others
Defendant:
Prime Energy Services, Inc. and Robert Joseph Shaw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Wingate v. H.E.H. Paving, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01757
Defendant:
H.E.H. Paving, Inc., Hobson Milner, Tarik Milner and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Wingate
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Woods v. H.E.H. Paving, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01758
Defendant:
H.E.H. Paving, Inc., Hobson Milner, Tarik Milner and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Woods
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
