Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rios v. M&M's Welding and Fabricating, Inc.
as 4:2022cv02003
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Arreola Rios
Defendant:
M&M's Welding and Fabricating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
George v. M&M Transit, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv03392
Plaintiff:
Mitch George
Defendant:
M&M Transit, LLC and John McMiller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Malone v. M&M Diversified, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
M&M Diversified, Inc., Marc Buyers and Abee Buyers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Malone v. M&M Diversified, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
M&M Diversified, Inc., Marc Buyers and Abee Buyers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
First National, Ltd. v. Humana Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00570
Plaintiff:
First National, Ltd.
Defendant:
Humana Inc , City Lights M&M Corp, Victor Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bryce v. M & M Scrap Metal Processors, LP et al
as 4:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Penny K. Bryce
Defendant:
M & M Scrap Metal Processors, LP, Stuart J. Bamberger and Richard E. Bamberger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Trustees of The Texas Iron Workers Pension Trust Fund et al v. M et al
as 4:2011cv03462
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The Texas Iron Workers Pension Trust Fund and Trustees of the Texas Iron Workers Defined Contribution Retirement Plan
Defendant:
A M M, Desean Allen Grant Hughes, William Allen Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Arevalo et al v. J & D Produce, Inc.
as 7:2008cv00329
Plaintiff:
Armando Arevalo, Sr., Armando Arevalo, Sr., Maria Arevalo and others
Defendant:
J & D Produce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Detho v. Rupani et al
as 4:2007cv00833
Plaintiff:
Rabia U. Detho and Rabia U. Detho
Defendant:
Amin Rupani, Firdous B Hamani, Texas Precious Corportion and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
