Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Arrowood et al v. All Four Seasons, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01209
Defendant:
Daniel L. Watkins and All Four Seasons, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arrowood and Aaron Richardson
HIPOLITO RIVERA et al v. GUERRERO et al
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
FLORENCIO HIPOLITO RIVERA , ALFONSO HERNANDEZ FEDERICO , ADAN HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
JAVIER GUERRERO, JACOB W PAULK, JR, GARY H PAULK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Becton et al v. WBY, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04003
Plaintiff:
Latoya Becton , Latisha Blake , Shanetria Cameron and others
Defendant:
WBY, Inc., Steven Youngelson, Surrey White and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Gray et al v. Mr. D's Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03878
Plaintiff:
Danny Gray and Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Mr. D's Trucking, Inc. and Desmond Watkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Freeman v. Willie A. Watkins Funeral Home of Riverdale, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00377
Plaintiff:
Vernon Freeman
Defendant:
Willie A. Watkins Funeral Home of Riverdale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Shelton et al v. Gourmet Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04206
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shelton , Detondra Thomas , Gregory Brantley and others
Defendant:
Gourmet Services, Inc., Gourmet Services Management Group, LLC, Nathaniel R. Goldston and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Marion v. Watkins Consulting, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Richard Marion
Defendant:
Watkins Consulting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Caldwell v. Icee of Atlanta, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01719
Plaintiff:
Julius Caldwell
Defendant:
Icee of Atlanta, Inc. and Kent Watkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Zamora-Vasquez et al v. Watkins et al
as 3:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Aron Zamora-Vasquez, Joel Hernandez-De La Cruz, Santos Lucas-Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Brian Watkins, Minor Produce, Inc. and Richard Minor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
