Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Alvarez Torres v. Dyerburg Grecian Steak House, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02354
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Alvarez Torres
Defendant:
Dyerburg Grecian Steak House, Inc. and Xristos Sakarelos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Alvarez v. Memphis-Shelby County Board of Education
as 2:2022cv02303
Plaintiff:
Jeanily Alvarez
Defendant:
Memphis-Shelby County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alvarez et al v. Daher Cleaning Services of Tennessee Company et al
as 3:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Silvia Alvarez and Ofelia Alvarez
Defendant:
Mara Daher-Boyer, Daher Cleaning Services of Tennessee Company and Siegfried A. Richter Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarez Torres v. Shogun Sushi Hibachi Inc.
as 1:2021cv01002
Defendant:
Shogun Sushi Hibachi Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Alvarez Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Leon et al v. Stanley Smith Drywall, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02083
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Leon , Francisco Lachino , Dolores Gallardo and others
Defendant:
Stanley Smith Drywall, Inc., Michael Wray and Stanley Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Sanchez-Zamora et al v. Los Matas Mexican Restaurant Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Sanchez-Zamora , Casey Van Dorl , Maria Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Los Matas Mexican Restaurant Inc., El Mezcalito, Inc., El Mezcal Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cuevas et al v. Southland Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02368
Plaintiff:
Anselmo Cuevas , Martin Vaquera , Jose Alfredo aka Jose Alvarez and others
Defendant:
Southland Landscaping, Inc. and John French
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Velasco et al v. Coley et al
as 2:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Pedro Chavez Velasco , Emigdio Salinas Alavez , Fredy Salinas Alvarez and others
Defendant:
Ralph M. Coley, Jr. and Connie Coley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
