Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Board of Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, et al v. R and F Plumbing and Fire Protection, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv01358
Defendant:
Hayk Sukazi, Alina Tovmasyan, Gayane Khudaverdyan and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Apprentice and Training Fund, The Sprinkler Fitters Local 709 Vacation Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Jam Fire Protection Inc
as 2:2012cv10164
Plaintiff:
Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Jam Fire Protection Inc
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. R and F Fire Protection Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08731
Defendant:
R and F Fire Protection Inc and Alfred Sarkisian
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and others
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No 669 U A AFL-CIO v. Cosco Fire Protection Inc et al
as 8:2012cv01596
Defendant:
Consolidated Fire Protection LLC and Cosco Fire Protection Inc
Plaintiff:
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No 669 U A AFL-CIO
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. JAM Fire Protection, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02357
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW - NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
JAM Fire Protection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
