Cases 1 - 6 of 6
GOTHAM CITY ORTHOPEDICS, LLC v. HORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv10107
Defendant:
ANTHEM INC., NON-NEW JERSEY BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD PLANS 1-10, AND JOHN DOES 1-10, HORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GOTHAM CITY ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OF ST. CLARE'S, LLC et al v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2019cv12112
Plaintiff:
EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OF ST. CLARE'S, LLC and EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF ST. MARY'S LLC
Defendant:
HORIZON NEW JERSEY HEALTH, HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD NEW JERSEY, HORIZON NJ HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
MASRI, M.D. v. HORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC., et al
as 2:2016cv06961
Plaintiff:
SAMMY I. MASRI, M.D.
Defendant:
HORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. , NON-NEW JERSEY BCBS PLANS 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.A. v. HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv05379
Plaintiff:
THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.A.
Defendant:
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION and TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE BENEFITS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DR. JASON D. COHEN, M.D., F.A.C.S. v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS, A DIVISION OF HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2013cv07478
Plaintiff:
DR. JASON D. COHEN, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS, A DIVISION OF HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION and VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND ALLIED EMPLOYEES et al v. CHRIST HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2011cv06676
Plaintiff:
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND ALLIED EMPLOYEES , AFT/AFL-CIO (HPAE) and HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND ALLIED EMPLOYEES LOCAL 5186
Defendant:
CHRIST HOSPITAL and PRIME HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
