Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Torres Espinoza v. United Site Services of California, Inc
as 3:2022cv02792
Plaintiff:
Jose Roberto Torres Espinoza
Defendant:
United Site Services of California, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
urzua et al v. burkett et al
as 2:2012at01445
Defendant:
robert burkett, matthew windorski and Burkett's Pool Plastering Inc
Plaintiff:
Jose de Jesus urzua, Melkisedec barerra , Luis Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
De Leon et al v. Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02740
Defendant:
Robert Burkett, Matthew Windorski and Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose de Jesus Urzua , Melkisedec Barrera , Luis Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Hidalgo General Engineering Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00785
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant:
Hidalgo General Engineering Inc and Jose Roberto Hidalgo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Hidalgo General Engineering Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00786
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant:
Hidalgo General Engineering Inc. and Jose Roberto Hidalgo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
