Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Taylor v. Bank of America Merchant Services
as 1:2019cv02496
Defendant:
Bank of America Merchant Services
Plaintiff:
Tanya Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Merchant v. Lake Park Two, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06037
Plaintiff:
Amir Ally Merchant
Defendant:
Lake Park Two, Inc. and Akber A. Mithani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Padilla et al v. Ruby Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04936
Plaintiff:
Christina Padilla and Jessica Zamudio
Defendant:
Ruby Foods, Inc. , Standard Foods, Inc. , Moonstone Foods Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rogers et al v. Merchant Services, Inc.
as 1:2014cv10410
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rogers , Rob Munson , Charles Matthews and others
Defendant:
Merchant Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Merchant v. IBM Long-Term Disability Plan et al
as 1:2013cv03848
Plaintiff:
Mumtaz Merchant
Defendant:
IBM Long-Term Disability Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rasic v. City of Northlake et al
as 1:2008cv00104
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rasic and Daniel Rasic
Defendant:
City of Northlake, Dennis A Koletsos, City of Northlake Police and Fire Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Chicago Addressing Merchants
as 1:2007cv05141
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Chicago Addressing Merchants
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Miscellaneous Warehousemen's Local 781 Health and Welfare Fund v. Chicago Addressing-Merchants Co.
as 1:2007cv01571
Plaintiff:
Miscellaneous Warehousemen's Local 781 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Chicago Addressing-Merchants Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
