Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pacheco v. Sharks Fish & Chicken LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Benito Pacheco
Defendant:
Sharks Fish & Chicken LLC doing business as Sharks Fish & Chicken, Bethlehem LLC doing business as Sharks Fish & Chicken, Mohammed Jabar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cody Beavers v. Cahaba Heights Plaza, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Cody Beavers
Defendant:
Cahaba Heights Plaza, LLC, United Pizza, Inc. and Mohammed (David) Dawoud
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Beavers v. Cahaba Heights Plaza LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Cody Beavers
Defendant:
Mohammed Dawoud and Cahaba Heights Plaza LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Al-Shareih v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 2:2018cv00683
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Al-Shareih
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Morales v. American Ranch House LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00682
Plaintiff:
Luis Morales
Defendant:
American Ranch House LLC and Hafedh Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Bailey v. Yousef, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
Mario Bailey
Defendant:
Yousef, Inc. , Oakwood Jiffy Mart and Mohammed Alzaybak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mohamed v. Mugshots Grill and Bar et al
as 2:2016cv00374
Plaintiff:
Alexis Mohamed
Defendant:
Mugshots Grill and Bar , Chris McDonald , Mugshots Inverness Corners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gilberto v. Mohammed et al
as 2:2015cv01085
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gilberto
Defendant:
Elsayed Mohammed and Al's Building LLC
Counter_claimant:
Al's Building LLC and Elsayed Mohammed
Counter_defendant:
Santiago Gilberto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Seacrest Investments, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01919
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Williams
Defendant:
Seacrest Investments, Inc. and Arif Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
