Cases 1 - 10 of 17
WRIGHT et al v. SAI HOTELS LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Samantha Wright, M.G. a minor and M G
Defendant:
SAI Hotels LLC dba Red Roof Inn Lavonia, Chetan Patel and SAI HOTELS LLC doing business as RED ROOF INN LAVONIA
Tinney v. Blu Sky Foods, LCC et al
as 1:2022cv03542
Plaintiff:
Sidney Tinney
Defendant:
Red Snapper, LLC, Blu Sky Foods, LLC and Munir Manasra
Barnett v. Shree Durga Shakti Inc.
as 4:2022cv00035
Counter Defendant:
Irene Barnett
Defendant:
Shree Durga Shakti Inc. doing business as Red Roof Inn
Counter Claimant:
Shree Durga Shakti Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Grau v. Home Towne Studios by Red Roof Gainesville, Georgia
as 2:2021cv00208
Plaintiff:
Eric Grau
Defendant:
Home Towne Studios by Red Roof Gainesville, Georgia
Mize v. 300 F Street, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Scott B. Jackmore and 300 F Street, Inc. A Domestic For-Profit Corporation doing business as The Red Carpet Lounge
Plaintiff:
Candace Mize
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GRABLE et al v. CP SECURITY GROUPS INC
as 5:2021cv00095
Defendant:
CP SECURITY GROUPS INC
Plaintiff:
Arthur Redding and KENNETH GRABLE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hendricks v. Ethan Hospitality, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Viren Patel, Ethan Hospitality, LLC, Mitesh Bhula and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ross v. Galardi South Enterprises Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05119
Plaintiff:
Mark Ross
Defendant:
Galardi South Enterprises Consulting, Inc. and Red Eyed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
WALTON v. CHEROKEE NATION RED WING LLC
as 4:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
DEBRA WALTON
Defendant:
CHEROKEE NATION RED WING LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WALTON v. CHEROKEE NATION RED WING LLC
as 3:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
DEBRA WALTON
Defendant:
CHEROKEE NATION RED WING LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
