Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Diaz Garza v. Chicago's Best, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06442
Plaintiff:
Rafael Diaz Garza
Defendant:
Chicago's Best, Inc. doing business as Chicago's Pizza and Martin Flores
Sapia et al v. Home Box Office, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03142
Plaintiff:
Neftali Pellot, Gary Phifer, Kendal Brazel and others
Defendant:
Home Box Office, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Diaz et al v. Ray's Super Deli Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06759
Defendant:
Hassan H. Safa, Ramon Velasquez, Jaafar Safa and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rafael Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl
Sapia et al v. Home Box Office, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01317
Plaintiff:
Michael Sapia , Christian Pellot , Neftali Pellot and others
Defendant:
Home Box Office, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Diaz v. Jere's Hardware, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03673
Defendant:
George Bandolf and Jere's Hardware, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rafael Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Valverde et al v. Mondragon et al
as 2:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Diaz Valverde , Rafael Diaz Valverde and Javier Martinez Gonzalez
Defendant:
Antonio Mondragon, Am Pro Installers LLC, Builders Firstsource Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DEJESUS v. Monterey Market, LLC et al
as 9:2014cv81251
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCA DEJESUS
Defendant:
Monterey Market, LLC and RAFAEL DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Del Sol v. Monterrey Market III, LLC et al
as 9:2013cv81043
Plaintiff:
Juan Del Sol
Defendant:
Monterrey Market III, LLC and Rafael Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Moreira v. Nefra Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv23365
Plaintiff:
Jairon Moreira
Defendant:
Nefra Corp. and Rafael Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Diaz v. Jersey Lynne Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04866
Defendant:
Donnie Borriello, Jersey Lynne Farms, Inc. and Michael Loconte
Plaintiff:
Rafael Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
