Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ROBBINS v. PLAYHOUSE LOUNGE et al
as 1:2019cv08387
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ROBBINS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and PLAYHOUSE LOUNGE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ROBBINS et al v. OTTO C. RODE, INC.
as 1:2011cv04741
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBBINS , ANTHONY BENIGNO , ROY KAISER and others
Defendant:
OTTO C. RODE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
ROBBINS v. GEISEL et al
as 3:2009cv03455
Plaintiff:
MARIE D. ROBBINS
Defendant:
ANGELA SCHWEIGER GEISEL, MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. ROBBINS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05555
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and WILLIAM J. EINHORN
Defendant:
ROBBINS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and ALAN ROBBINS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 56 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. THE MCKEOGH COMPANY et al
as 1:2007cv01560
Plaintiff:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 56 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, BRIAN STRING, BRIAN MCWILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
THE MCKEOGH COMPANY, THE MCKEOGH COMPANY, JAMES J. MCKEOGH and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ANTHONY CINAGLIA, ANTHONY CINAGLIA, ERIC TEN BROECK and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
THE MCKEOGH COMPANY, THE MCKEOGH COMPANY, JAMES J. MCKEOGH and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. ROBBINS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
as 1:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and WILLIAM J. EINHORN
Defendant:
ROBBINS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
