Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cox et al v. Francesca's Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv18527
Defendant:
Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing, P.C., Hepworth Gershbaum & Roth, Francesca's Holdings Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Cox and D'Shaunta Perry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA v. BROWN et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2018cv04955
Plaintiff:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Defendant:
JAMES T BROWN and ESTATE OF ROTH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Harm Sr. et al v. Garden Homes Management et al
as 2:2017cv04604
Plaintiff:
BARRY T. HARM, SR. and BARRY T. HARM, JR.
Defendant:
GARDEN HOMES MANAGEMENT, GARDEN COMMUNITIES, MANSFIELD VILLAGE GARDEN APARTMENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ORLOWSKI v. ORLOWSKI et al
as 2:2017cv00642
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. ORLOWSKI
Defendant:
JOANNA B. ORLOWSKI , STEVEN H. ROTH, JAMES M. STEINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
McKenzie v. A.A.F.E.S. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah McKenzie
Defendant:
AAFES, Exchange Army and Air Force Exchange Service, JOHN SHARP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FISH et al v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY et al
as 3:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. FISH, RICHARD J. GAUDY, ANGELO M. AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THOMAS v. MCCOURT et al
as 3:2004cv05068
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE THOMAS, HAROLD HILL, DEBRA K. CRAIG and others
Defendant:
DAVID C. MCCOURT, MICHAEL J. MAHONEY, COMPENSATION COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.