Labor Cases filed in Pennsylvania
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff: MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant: RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC and RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
EVERETT v. CORRECT CHOICE HOME CARE, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04765
Plaintiff: KHALEELAH EVERETT
Defendant: CORRECT CHOICE HOME CARE, LLC and JOSHUA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ACOSTA v. POINT TO POINT AUTO REPAIR, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02029
Plaintiff: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant: POINT TO POINT AUTO REPAIR, INC., PHILADELPHIA TAXI MANAGEMENT, LLC, TWO ONE FIVE METER SHOP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GOODWIN v. CALM-2, INC.
as 2:2016cv05386
Plaintiff: EVERETT GOODWIN
Defendant: CALM-2, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ROBBINS et al v. FREEDOM TAXI ASSOCIATION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04201
Plaintiff: STEVEN ROBBINS , VINCENT OBERTON and SHERMAN HOWARD
Defendant: FREEDOM TAXI ASSOCIATION, LLC , POINT TO POINT AUTO REPAIR, INC. , TWO.ONE.FIVE METER SHOP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILLIAMS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff: VIVIAN WILLIAMS , EDWARD APONTE , PEDRO ACRE and others
Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Everett v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00926
Plaintiff: Ruth A Everett
Defendant: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVERETT v. FINE GRINDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv05638
Plaintiff: VIRGINIA EVERETT
Defendant: FINE GRINDING CORPORATION, FINE GRINDING CORPORATION DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN and HERBERT TIMOTHY EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?