Cases 91 - 100 of 13,456
ALLEN v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45884
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. ALLEN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL, UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CLEMENT v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45888
Plaintiff:
HARRY F. CLEMENT
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CLARK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65704
Plaintiff:
HOWARD V CLARK and MARTHA CLARK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIDCAP et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65618
Plaintiff:
JAMES I. MIDCAP and SARA A. MIDCAP
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ACANDS, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERKKILA v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66145
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LIANE ERKKILA
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY , KINSMAN LINES INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY and USS GREAT LAKES FLEET INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YARBROUGH et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65621
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. YARBROUGH and FLORENCE YARBROUGH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ACANDS, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWFORD v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65707
Plaintiff:
IVAGEAN PHYLLIS CRAWFORD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIRBREBOARD CORPORATION, FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HINKLE v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65623
Plaintiff:
ROY A. HINKLE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ACANDS, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65706
Plaintiff:
JAMES J CLARK and CAROL CLARK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETRONEK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65617
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER J. PETRONEK and PAULINE PETRONEK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ACANDS, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC.
Cross_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
