Cases 91 - 100 of 106
FINZ v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07201
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FINZ
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC. and BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS et al v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06764
Plaintiff:
WYATT HARRIS and LINDA HARRIS
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC. and BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
URCIOULI et al v. CAHILL, M.D. et al
as 2:2012cv06608
Plaintiff:
DONATO URCIOULI and DEBRA URCIOULI
Defendant:
JAMES W. CAHILL, M.D., BIOMET, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10, fictitious names and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
ROSE v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06207
Plaintiff:
MARLENE ROSE
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC. and BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SZABO v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05880
Plaintiff:
JOAN SZABO
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC., BIOMET, LLC and BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MIELE v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv05359
Plaintiff:
LOUISE MIELE
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC. and BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARRELL et al v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05313
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FARRELL and MICHELLE FARRELL
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC. and BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS et al v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv05305
Plaintiff:
DENNIS BROOKS and BRENDA BROOKS
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC. and BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTERN et al v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv04931
Plaintiff:
GREGG MATTERN and RAQUEL MATTERN
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC. , BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC , BIOMET FAIR LAWN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE et al v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv04209
Plaintiff:
GARY WADE and ROBIN WADE
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC. , BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
