Cases 91 - 100 of 21,574
Ash v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bussey et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02312
Plaintiff:
Sedrick D. Bussey and Dee Bussey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bien-Aime v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02311
Plaintiff:
Renee L. Bien-Aime
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chione v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Chione
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02326
Plaintiff:
Melissa F. Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wardlaw et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Walter A. Wardlaw and Karla J. Wardlaw
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huffman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02277
Plaintiff:
Franklin Huffman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCoy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Darcy McCoy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rose v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02293
Plaintiff:
Martin Rose
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
