Cases 91 - 100 of 21,578
Feliz v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
Abiu Feliz
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fonsworth v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02316
Plaintiff:
Bennett M. Fonsworth
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gatling v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02318
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gatling
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hiltz-Scerbo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02322
Plaintiff:
Leiza A. Hiltz-Scerbo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ash v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bussey et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02312
Plaintiff:
Sedrick D. Bussey and Dee Bussey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bien-Aime v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02311
Plaintiff:
Renee L. Bien-Aime
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chione v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Chione
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02326
Plaintiff:
Melissa F. Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wardlaw et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Walter A. Wardlaw and Karla J. Wardlaw
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
