Cases 91 - 100 of 450
SCOTT v. AC&S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62340
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA SCOTT
Defendant:
AC&S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IMHOFF v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62200
Plaintiff:
MARY PARKER IMHOFF
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC , CELOTEX CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62168
Plaintiff:
HUBERT MILLER and ISABEL MILLER
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEBERT et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62264
Plaintiff:
ROLAND J HEBERT and ALIF M HEBERT
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOYE v. AC&S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62327
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. MOYE
Defendant:
AC&S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61397
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EVYLVEN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IVEY et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62258
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL R IVEY and RUTH EARLINE IVEY
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOUNSBERRY v. CELOTEX CORP et al
as 2:2011cv62159
Plaintiff:
BERNICE LOUNSBERRY
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORP , A C & S, INC , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NELSON et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv61674
Plaintiff:
ALVIN NELSON and MARY NELSON
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAMAS v. FORTY EIGHT INSULATION, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60139
Plaintiff:
CLAY DAMAS, SR
Defendant:
FORTY EIGHT INSULATION, INC., NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , STANDARD INSULATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
