Cases 91 - 100 of 147
Schachter v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01766
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Marc Paul Schachter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Marquez v. Gentry
as 2:2017cv01718
Respondent:
Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez-Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fly v. Gentry
as 2:2017cv01611
Petitioner:
Dane Fly
Respondent:
Jo Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 2:2017cv01668
Defendant:
Adams, James Dzurenda, Estate of David Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayala v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01617
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Omar Ayala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bishop v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01595
Plaintiff:
Shane Edward Bishop
Defendant:
Jo Gentry and Vagnapiano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01592
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Steven L. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01589
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Larry James Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01590
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Rodney Lavelle Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01570
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Esteban Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
