Cases 91 - 100 of 5,178
HAASE v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69004
Plaintiff:
CURTIS E HAASE
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68994
Defendant:
A C AND S INC, CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLER v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68941
Plaintiff:
VIOLA A ELLER
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOGUE v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69006
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE E HOGUE
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOOTH v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68944
Plaintiff:
WILLARD BOOTH
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANN v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69005
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R HANN
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VICTOR v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69019
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VICTOR
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, AIRCO INC/ BOC GROUP, THE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROUGH v. A C AND S INC
as 2:2010cv69034
Plaintiff:
HUBERT O BROUGH
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLELLAN v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68938
Plaintiff:
MELVIN S. MCCLELLAN
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERCIFIELD v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68937
Plaintiff:
WALLACE G. PERCIFIELD
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
