Cases 91 - 97 of 97
CLEMONS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2007cv01245
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CLEMONS
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
LEMAY v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al
as 1:2007cv01082
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ALLEN LEMAY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUAREZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2007cv00955
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GILBERTO JUAREZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
RAMOS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv00895
Plaintiff:
RAUL CASTILLO RAMOS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
COOPER v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2007cv00744
Plaintiff:
ANDRE COOPER
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SCALES v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
as 1:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCALES
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CALLAWAY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2004cv01506
Plaintiff:
HENRY CALLAWAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY , UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
