Cases filed in Idaho
Cases 91 - 100 of 268
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00510
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Clyne v. Moody et al
as 1:2016cv00505
Petitioner: Heath Thomas Clyne
Respondent: M. Moody, Jon A. Loschi, Greg Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Farnsworth et al
as 2:2016cv00433
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Defendant: Mary Farnsworth , Leanne Marten and Thomas Tidwell
Amicu: Bonner County , Panhandle Forest Collaborative , American Forest Resource Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
John and Jane Does 1-104 v. Wasden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00429
Defendant: Lawrence Wasden, Kevin Kempf, Terry Kirkham and others
Plaintiff: John and Jane Does 1-104
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hooley v. Blades
as 1:2016cv00418
Petitioner: Thomas K. Hooley
Respondent: Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clyne v. Hofkins et al
as 1:2016cv00415
Plaintiff: Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant: Gabriel Hofkins, Tazmin Creel and Cade McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Page We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00386
Petitioner: Michael Thomas Hayes
Respondent: Chad Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sabic et al v. Sergeant
as 1:2016cv00370
Plaintiff: Asim Sabic , URS Midwest dba United Road and United Road Services and GE TF Trust
Defendant: Thomas Sergeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sabic v. Sergeant et al
as 1:2016cv00369
Plaintiff: Asim Sabic
Defendant: Thomas Sergeant , GE TF Trust and URS Midwest, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clyne v. Greenwood et al
as 1:2016cv00363
Petitioner: Heath Thomas Clyne
Respondent: Greenwood and Voght
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?