Cases 91 - 100 of 186
Ethier v. The US Department of Justice et al
as 3:2015cv00967
Plaintiff:
Bernard Allen Ethier
Defendant:
The US Department of Justice, The US Attorney General, The White House and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ndegwa v. US Attorney General
as 8:2014cv03222
Petitioner:
Benjamin Ndegwa
Respondent:
US Attorney General and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Deterville v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv23628
Plaintiff:
Simeon Deterville
Defendant:
US Attorney General , Department of Homeland Security and US ICE Field Office Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Drummond v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv23510
Plaintiff:
Calfus Drummond
Defendant:
US Attorney General , Department of Homeland Security , US ICE Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv81164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Davis v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv22893
Plaintiff:
Kervin Brodrick Davis
Defendant:
US Attorney General , Department of Homeland Security , US ICE Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diop v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv22868
Plaintiff:
Sapoleck Fall Diop
Defendant:
US Attorney General , Department of Homeland Security , US ICE Field Office Director for Baker County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2014cv00811
Petitioner:
Bikram Singh
Respondent:
US Attorney General, Jeh Johnson, Marc J. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00590
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
