Cases 91 - 100 of 1,577
Accelerated v. LMI II
as 23-6062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ACCELERATED, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
LMI II, LLC
Fuel Automation v. Energera
as 23-1123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FUEL AUTOMATION STATION, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
ENERGERA INC and ENERGERA INC.
Johnson v. Metropolitan Property
as 23-6061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAR G. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Boulter, et al v. Noble Energy, et al
as 23-1118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE BOULTER, BOULTER, LLC, RALPH NIX PRODUCE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NOBLE ENERGY INC. and KERR-MCGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE, LP
Tungsten Parts Wyoming v. Omanoff, et al
as 23-8018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TUNGSTEN PARTS WYOMING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS OMANOFF, GEORGE PAZOS, GLOBAL TUNGSTEN AND POWDERS CORP. and others
Five Points Management Group v. Campaign, et al
as 23-1125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIVE POINTS MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMPAIGN, INC., a Delaware corporation and BRADLEY SEWELL, an individual
Garnishee:
HARTMAN ART STUDIOS, LLC
White & Weddle v. Shatar Holdings, et al
as 23-6032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
1005, LLC, AMF DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AMIR FARZANEH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHATAR HOLDINGS, LLC, SHATAR CAPITAL, INC., EZRI NAMVAR and others
Chesapeake Operating v. C.C. Forbes
as 23-6052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
C.C. FORBES, LLC
Unitednet, et al v. Tata Communications America, et al
as 23-2057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITEDNET LTD. and LEVI RUSSELL
Defendant / Appellee:
TATA COMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, INC., TATA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA, TATA SONS PRIVATE, LTD. and others
Asphalt Recovery Specialists, et al v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
as 23-1131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASPHALT RECOVERY SPECIALISTS, INC., SEDER INVESTMENT LLC, STEVEN SEDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO., DBA Gallagher Centennial Insurance Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
