Real Property Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 91 - 100 of 317
Melot v. Roberson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2234
Plaintiff - Appellant: BILLY R. MELOT
Defendant - Appellee: LEE ROBERSON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BOBBY SHAW
Pierce v. Green Tree Servicing We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1473
Plaintiff - Appellant: BILLY PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee: GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
United States v. Osage Wind, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-5121
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: OSAGE WIND, LLC, ENEL KANSAS, LLC and ENEL GREEN POWER NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Movant To Intervene - Appellant: OSAGE MINERALS COUNCIL
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3278
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee: NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: APPROXIMATELY 9117 ACRES IN PRATT, KINGMAN, AND RE TRACT NO. 1062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 2062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less, located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 3062710, containing 160.00 acres more or less, located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein other PL/EL/TL-3062710 and others
Defendant - Appellant: NASH OIL AND GAS DEFENDANTS, PRATT WELL SERVICE DEFENDANTS, VAL ENERGY DEFENDANTS and others
Defendant Counterclaimant: JANDIE OIL CO., INC., IVAN W. MILTON, LISA M. MILTON and others
Defendant: STULL & BEVERLIN, LLC
:
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3285
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee: NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant: MEIRIES LANDOWNER GROUP
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3286
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee: NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant: TRACT NO. 1012711, containing 159.88 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein other PL/EL/TL-1012711, TRACT NO. 1032711, containing 139.04 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 1042711, containing 159.40 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein and others
Defendant Counterclaimant: PAUL J. BEAVER, L.D. DAVIS, CARL DUDREY and others
Defendant: KENNETH GLENN, STULL & BEVERLIN, LLC, APPROXIMATELY 9117 ACRES IN PRATT, KINGMAN, AND RE TRACT NO. 1062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein and others
:
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3279
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee: NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant: HUDSON GROUP DEFENDANTS
Leathers, et al v. Leathers, et al
as 15-3280
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL R. LEATHERS
Defendant - Appellee: RONALD LEATHERS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and EARLINE F. DIKEMAN, Special Administrator of the Estate of Theresa L. Leathers, deceased
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES HOLDEN, Trustee for The, AKA Dirt Cheap Mine Trust
Defendant: CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC., OXY USA INC., ANADARKO PETROLEUM COMPANY, L.P. and others
Movant - Appellant: JOE ALFRED IZEN, JR.
Hardscrabble Ranch v. United State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1438
Plaintiff - Appellant: HARDSCRABBLE RANCH, LLC, FKA Farley Ranch, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3272
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellant: NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: MEIRIES LANDOWNER GROUP, NASH OIL AND GAS DEFENDANTS and PRATT WELL SERVICE DEFENDANTS
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellee: L.D. DRILLING DEFENDANTS, VAL ENERGY DEFENDANTS, HUDSON GROUP DEFENDANTS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?